History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Moore
2 Ohio St. 3d 11
Ohio
1982
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

After a careful examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings and conclusions of the board that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(l), DR 6-101(A)(3), and DR 7-101(A)(2).

It is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Moore
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 24, 1982
Citation: 2 Ohio St. 3d 11
Docket Number: D.D. No. 82-23
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.