History
  • No items yet
midpage
Day v. State
110 Ga. 254
Ga.
1899
Check Treatment
Lewis, J.

The charge relating to the impeachment of witnesses was substantially correct, and free from material error. Whilst the evidence was conflicting, that in behalf of the State was sufficient to . warrant the verdict, and, as the same has been approved by the trial judge, this court, under the established rule applicable to such cases, will not control his discretion in denying a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. W. A. Dodson and J. W. Haygood, for plaintiff in error. J. M. Terrell, attorney-general, and F. A. Hooper, solicitor-general, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Day v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 26, 1899
Citation: 110 Ga. 254
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.