710 So. 2d 476 | Ala. Crim. App. | 1998
On November 1, 1996, we remanded this case for a new trial based on Dawson's allegation of juror misconduct. In that original opinion, we also held that the appellant's allegation that he was denied the right to a speedy trial was without merit. See Dawson v. State,
We addressed the appellant's arguments concerning the speedy trial issues in our original opinion. Our holding that the appellant's right to a speedy trial was not violated was not affected by the supreme court's opinion.
Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
All judges concur.