History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dawson v. Follen
7 F. Cas. 216
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1808
Check Treatment
WASHINGTON. Circuit Justice

(PETERS, District Judge, absent), informed the jury, ¿hat to entitle the plaintiff to recover, they must be satisfied that he was the original inventor, not only in relation to the United States, but to other parts of the world; in which respect, the act of congress differed from the law of England on this subject That even if there were no proof that the plaintiff was acquainted with the circumstance, that the discovery had before been made, still he could not recover, if in truth he was not the original inventor. Upon the evidence, the charge was strongly against the plaintiff. Verdict for defendant

Case Details

Case Name: Dawson v. Follen
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 15, 1808
Citation: 7 F. Cas. 216
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.