100 Pa. 201 | Pa. | 1882
delivered the opinion of the court April 24th 1882.
The very able argument of the learned counsel for the appellant has not convinced us of any error in the decree of the court below. Under the will of John Davis, Sr., the trustee was not the mere recipient, and passive, holder, of the legal title, without duties to perform. The entire principal of the estate was to be securely invested and so remain during the lives of all the children, and the two grand-children, and the income
On the subject of commissions we see no sufficient reason for interfering with the action of the auditing judge and the Orphans’ Court. In view of all the circumstances it is not clear that the amount allowed was unreasonable.
Decree affirmed at the cost of the appellant.