As the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law (Walker v. Walker,63 N.H. 321" court="N.H." date_filed="1885-06-05" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/walker-v-walker-3550595?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3550595">63 N.H. 321; Bassett v. Brown, 61 N.H. 602" court="N.H." date_filed="1882-06-05" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/bassett-v-brown-3554141?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3554141">61 N.H. 602; Rollins v. Riley, 44 N.H. 9" court="N.H." date_filed="1860-10-18" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/rollins-v-riley-8046919?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="8046919">44 N.H. 9), equity will not afford relief. But by a motion addressed to the superior court she may obviate this defect by filing an appropriate count at law as an amendment of the bill. Walker v. Walker, supra, 326. Until that is done the order must be
Exception sustained.
All concurred.