History
  • No items yet
midpage
Davis v. Whitney
68 N.H. 66
N.H.
1894
Check Treatment

The referee has found that the use made by the defendants of their premises was reasonable. According to the decisions in this state, the defendants are entitled to judgment. Bassett v. Salisbury Co., *Page 67 43 N.H. 569; Hayes v. Waldron, 44 N.H. 580; Swett v. Cutts, 50 N.H. 439; Eaton v. Railroad, 51 N.H. 504, 533; Brown v. Collins, 53 N.H. 442; Haley v. Colcord, 59 N.H. 7; Green v. Gilbert, 60 N.H. 144; Rindge v. Sargent,64 N.H. 294.

Judgment for the defendants.

All concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Davis v. Whitney
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1894
Citation: 68 N.H. 66
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.