70 Iowa 465 | Iowa | 1886
I. The petition alleges that plaintiff and defendants entered into a verbal agreement of employment
II. The circuit court, against defendants’ objection, permitted plaintiff to introduce evidence of a conversation had
III. It is insisted by defendants’ counsel that the evidence does not support the verdict, and that the verdict
IY. The court, in presenting the issues to the jury, did not state or refer to the claim in the petition that defendants
Y. The fourth instruction informed the jury that for any breach of the contract the party in default would be liable for damages. Counsel complain that it is erroneous, because it is unqualified., We presume counsel mean that it is not qualified as to the
YI. It is insisted that the sixth instruction is erroneous, in that it directs the jury that plaintiff may recover for ser-
YI1. An instruction directed the jury to allow plaintiff interest upon sums from the date when they should have
Other objections made to the instructions we think demand no special attention. In our opinion, the judgment of the circuit court ought to be
AFFIRMED.