History
  • No items yet
midpage
Davis v. State
334 Ark. 427
Ark.
1998
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Eric Davis, by his attorney, C. Richard Lippard, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the Appellant.

This court has held that we will grant a motion for rule on the clerk when the attorney admits that the record was not timely filed due to an error on his part. See, e.g., Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 804 (1986). Here, the attorney does not admit fault on his part. We have held that a statement that it was someone else’s fault or no one’s fault will not suffice. See Clark v. State, 289 Ark. 382, 711 S.W.2d 162 (1986). Therefore, Appellant’s motion must be denied.

Appellant’s attorney, C. Richard Lippard, shall file within thirty days from the date of this per curiam a motion and affidavit in this case accepting full responsibility for not timely filing the transcript, and upon filing same, the motion will be granted and a copy of the opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Davis v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Oct 1, 1998
Citation: 334 Ark. 427
Docket Number: CR 98-1135
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.