History
  • No items yet
midpage
Davis v. State
750 S.W.2d 60
Ark.
1988
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Petitioner Howard D. Davis, by his attorney, has filed a second motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert Meurer, has by affidavit admitted it was his fault that the record was not timely tendered.

We find that the error, admittedly made by the criminal defendant’s attorney, is good cause to grant the motion for a rule on the clerk.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Case Details

Case Name: Davis v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Jun 6, 1988
Citation: 750 S.W.2d 60
Docket Number: RC 88-31
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.