midpage

Davis v. StateDavis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Dec 11, 1985
No. 85-242
Versions:480 So. 2d 672
10 Fla. L. Weekly 2747
1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 6099
PER CURIAM.

In our initial opinion of August 16, 1985, we reversed appellant’s sentence on the ground that the trial court’s application of the guidelines rule in effect at the time of sentencing, rather than the rule in effect when the crimes were committed, was unlawful. Since that date, the Florida Supreme Court issued its opinion in State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985), in which it stated that a modification in the sentencing guidelines procedure is merely a procedural change which does not require the application of the ex post facto doctrine. The court remanded Jackson for resentencing under the guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing. . Therefore, on the authority of Jackson, we withdraw our initial opinion and affirm appellant’s sentence.

Affirmed.

RYDER, C.J., and SCHEB and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Davis v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 11, 1985
Citations: 480 So. 2d 672; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2747; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 6099; No. 85-242
Docket Number: No. 85-242
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In