PER CURIAM.
We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation. Jones v. State, 348 So. 2d 942" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." date_filed="1977-08-17" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/jones-v-state-1933623?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1933623">348 So.2d 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). However, at hearing evidence was not presented regarding—nor *887did appellant admit — violation of condition (a) which prohibits changing residence without permission. Therefore, any reference to violation of condition (a) should be stricken from the order. Brouillett v. State, 373 So. 2d 449" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." date_filed="1979-08-01" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/brouillett-v-state-1943705?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1943705">373 So.2d 449 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
BOARDMAN, A. C. J., and OTT and DANAHY, JJ., concur.