295 So. 2d 124 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1974
Appellant pled guilty to charges of robbery, assault with intent to commit rape, and having a firearm while committing or
The grounds relied upon by appellant for reversal of the judgment are without merit.
The lower court erred, however, in imposing a separate sentence for having a firearm while committing or attempting to commit a felony, to wit, robbery, since the “firearm” charge was a facet of the robbery charge. The only valid sentence that could have been entered was for the highest offense. Cone v. State, Fla.1973, 285 So.2d 12; Simmons v. State, Fla.App.2d 1973, 287 So.2d 369; Smith v. State, Fla. App.2d 1974, 287 So.2d 404.
The sentence on the lesser “firearm” charge is vacated, and the judgment is
Affirmed as modified.