History
  • No items yet
midpage
Davis v. State
118 So. 923
Ala. Ct. App.
1928
Check Treatment

Defendant was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree and appeals. This is a most unusual case — a homicide without reason or motive. The parties barely knew each other. The dying declaration of deceased, which was introduced in evidence after due proof of the necessary predicate, identifies the defendant as the party doing the shooting. The defendant denies the act and offers proof of good character and an alibi. The evidence of identity is in some respects unsatisfactory, but is sufficient to make a jury question. On this record we are not authorized to disturb the verdict. There is no error prejudicial to defendant, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Davis v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 13, 1928
Citation: 118 So. 923
Docket Number: 2 Div. 414.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.