History
  • No items yet
midpage
Davis v. Smith
2 Cal. 423
Cal.
1852
Check Treatment

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Heydenfeldt, Justice.

This was an appeal from a refusal to grant a new trial. The evidence is conflicting, and might have warranted, a verdict on either side. It is in such cases not the province of the Court to disturb the finding. It is presumed that the jury or the Court had good reasons for giving more credence to the witnesses of the successful party.

Judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Davis v. Smith
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1852
Citation: 2 Cal. 423
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.