History
  • No items yet
midpage
Davis v. Ostrander
1 Johns. Cas. 106
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1799
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

It is not a bond for the payment of money, and not within the act of congress on this subject, and therefore need not be stamped.(a)

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Note. On the application of the clerk for the direction of the court on the question, whether powers of attorney in suits depending in this court, ought to be received without being stamped,

The Court said, that such powers need not be stamped, and that the above mentioned act applies to general letters of attorney only.

See Burns v. Baker, infra, 134. Conry v. Warren, infra, vol. 3, 259.

Case Details

Case Name: Davis v. Ostrander
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 15, 1799
Citation: 1 Johns. Cas. 106
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.