History
  • No items yet
midpage
Davis v. Osgood
44 A. 432
| N.H. | 1898
|
Check Treatment

The contract between the plaintiff and Ricker was a conditional sale of chattels in Maine, and its validity is to be tested by the laws of that state. Cleveland Machine Works v. Lang, 67 N.H. 348, 363, and cases there cited. Since the conditional vendee resided in New Hampshire, the sale to be valid against "any other person than the parties thereto" required that the notes and agreement be recorded in Ellsworth, where the property was when the notes and agreement were executed. The neglect to have them so recorded was fatal to the plaintiff's claim. The provisions of our statute respecting the records of such sales (P.S., c. 140, s. 23) apply only to sales that are made within the state. They have no extra-territorial force. Cleveland Machine Works v. Lang, supra; Dorntee Casket Co. v. Gunnison, ante, p. 297.

Judgment for the defendant.

BLODGETT, C.J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Davis v. Osgood
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1898
Citation: 44 A. 432
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.