History
  • No items yet
midpage
Davis v. Mandau
400 So. 2d 89
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1981
Check Treatment
DANAHY, Judge.

We find no error in the entry of the summary judgments for appellees in this case. For the reasons set forth in Beattie v. Brotz, 391 So.2d 802 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), we reverse the cost order in favor of appellee Evans to the extent that it taxes the costs of copies of depositions.

Pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution, and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(iv), we certify this decision as being in direct conflict with the decisions of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Sampaio, 374 So.2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Moore v. Caughey, 368 So.2d 109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); County of St. Lucie v. Browning, 358 So.2d 253 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

AFFIRMED but REMANDED for the entry of a new cost order which excludes the costs of copies of depositions.

GRIMES, Acting C. J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Davis v. Mandau
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jun 3, 1981
Citation: 400 So. 2d 89
Docket Number: Nos. 79-2169, 80-197
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.