History
  • No items yet
midpage
Davis v. Garden Hills Corp.
157 S.E. 472
Ga.
1931
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

.1. A general demurrer to a petition should not be sustained if the facts entitle the plaintiff to any of the substantial relief prayed. McLaren v. Steapp, 1 Ga. 376; Dyson v. Washington Telephone Co., 157 Ga. 67 (3) (121 S. E. 105); Blaylock v. Hackel, 164 Ga. 257 (5) (138 S. E. 333); Arteaga v. Arteaga, 169 Ga. 595 (4) (151 S. E. 5).

2. The petition in this ease set forth facts which entitled the plaintiff to some of the substantial relief prayed; and the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the judgment of the trial judge sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concu/r, except Eill, J., who dissents.

Case Details

Case Name: Davis v. Garden Hills Corp.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 21, 1931
Citation: 157 S.E. 472
Docket Number: No. 7356
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.