Plaintiff Cassandra A. Davis, guardian of the minor Michael Davis, Jr., brought this tort action against defendants Dublin City Board of Education (the “Board of Education”) and Shellie Stroman, Jr., the principal of Hillcrest Elementary School (the “School”) which is operated by the Board of Education. According to the complaint, on March 15, 1993, plaintiff’s seven-year-old son tripped over a rug that was negligently placed at the entrance to the School, “fell through a cracked glass door and was seriously injured.” By amendment, plaintiff further alleged that the cracked glass door at the entrance to the School “constituted a wilful and reckless disregard for the safety of underaged persons such as Michael Davis, Jr. [and further that the] cracked glass door . . . constituted a nuisance of which Defendants were aware and failed to repair.” Defendants denied the material allegations and jointly moved for summary judgment on the basis of sovereign immunity. In so doing, defendants “concede[d] that a policy of liability insurance is in effect which provides coverage for the incident complained of, but den[ied] that their immunity is waived as a consequence.” The trial court granted defendants’ motion, and this appeal followed. Held:
In five related enumerations of error, plaintiff contends the grant of summary judgment is erroneous either because no immunity applies or else because any colorable claim of immunity has been waived. We do not agree.
1. “School districts are political subdivisions of this State.
Jennings v. New Bronwood School District,
2. Plaintiff’s amendment to the complaint alleging that such failure to repair “constituted wilful and reckless disregard for the safety of underaged persons” is unsupported by any evidence of that
intent
to inflict injury which distinguishes mere negligence from such “wilful or wanton conduct [as] will remove the shield of sovereign [and official] immunity.”
Truelove v. Wilson,
3. Nevertheless, plaintiff contends in her fourth enumeration that any claim of immunity has been waived by the existence of a liability insurance policy covering the incident at issue. This contention is without merit.
The above-mentioned amendment to the 1983 Georgia Constitution, Art. I, Sec. II, Par. IX, “extended sovereign immunity to all state departments and agencies, regardless of the existence of liability insurance.
Donaldson v. Dept. of Transp.,
4. Since each defendant is afforded sovereign or official immunity and that immunity has not been waived despite the existence of a liability insurance policy, we need not consider whether the cracked glass door amounted to a nuisance, as contended in the fifth enumeration.
Sheley v. Bd. of Public Ed. for the City of Savannah &c.,
Judgment affirmed.
