History
  • No items yet
midpage
Davis v. Bogart
22 N.Y.S. 1114
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1892
Check Treatment

No opinion. Judgment and order reversed on the exceptions, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Held : (1) That the court erred in receiving evidence of the declarations of the witness Buskey ; (2) that there was-no evidence that the plaintiff’s mortgage was fraudulent as against Buskey’» creditors, and the court improperly refused to charge the jury to that effect; (3) the court improperly refused to charge that the price agreed upon between the defendant and Buskey for keeping the mule was conclusive upon the defendant, and he could not claim a lien upon the mule for any greater sum for such keeping.

Case Details

Case Name: Davis v. Bogart
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 9, 1892
Citation: 22 N.Y.S. 1114
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.