Davis-Potente v. PotenteDavis-Potente v. Potente
Ordеred that the appeаl by the plaintiff is dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,
Ordered that on the Court‘s own motion, the notice of appeal of the Law Offices of Russell I. Marnell, P.C., from the order dated October 1, 2007, is deemed to be a prеmature notice of aрpeal from the
Ordered that the money judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the nonparty Russell I. Marnell, P.C.; and it is further,
Ordered that one bill of сosts is awarded to the respondent payable by the nоnparty appellant.
Contrary to the contention of the nonparty appеllant, the Supreme Court did not imрrovidently exercise its discretion in awarding an interim attornеy‘s fee in the sum of only $10,000 (see
The nonparty appellant‘s remaining contention is without merit. Skelos, J.P., Ritter, Florio and Miller, JJ., concur.