History
  • No items yet
midpage
Davila v. State
542 So. 2d 1067
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1989
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

David Armando Davila appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Although the trial judge denied the motion without an *1068evidentiary hearing, he did not attach to his order any portion of the files or record to refute Davila’s allegations.

Accordingly, we reverse the order denying Davila’s motion and remand the case to the trial court. On remand, unless the case files and records conclusively show that Davila is not entitled to relief, the trial court shall order the state to file an answer. After receipt of the answer, the trial court shall determine whether an evidentia-ry hearing is required. If the trial court should summarily deny the motion again, it shall attach such portions of the record which conclusively refute Davila’s allegations. Any party aggrieved by the subsequent action of the trial court must file a notice of appeal within thirty days to obtain appellate review.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Davila v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 12, 1989
Citation: 542 So. 2d 1067
Docket Number: No. 89-01042
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.