David Mcculla, et Ux. v. Brian C. Rell, D.P.M., 140 So. 3d 538

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the Second District Court of Appeal’s decision in Rell v. McCulla, 101 So. 3d 878 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and LEWIS, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.

Louis Thaler, Coral Gables, Florida, for Petitioners

Ross L. Fogleman, III of Dickinson & Gibbons, P.A., Sarasota, Florida; Mark Hicks, Dinah Stein, and Michael S. Hirschkowitz of Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, P.A., Miami, Florida, for Respondents

Case Details

Case Name: David Mcculla, et Ux. v. Brian C. Rell, D.P.M.

Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida

Date Published: May 29, 2014

Citations: 140 So. 3d 538; 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 364; 2014 WL 2208904; 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1739; SC12-2598

Docket Number: SC12-2598

Court Abbreviation: Fla.