History
  • No items yet
midpage
Daughtery v. Commonwealth
1976 Va. LEXIS 287
Va.
1976
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This appeal, like Hodge v. Commonwealth, 217 Va. 338, 228 S.E.2d 692, (this day decided), challenges the defendant’s second degree murder conviction under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as explicated in Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684 (1975), and In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970). The challenged instruction here, Instruction D, was the equivalent of Instruction 17 in Hodge.

Since the law of Virginia and this instruction only required the defendant to produce some evidence contesting the presumed malice, and the ultimate burden of persuasion beyond a reasonable doubt remained with the Commonwealth, we find this claim to be without merit for the reasons set forth in Hodge.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Daughtery v. Commonwealth
Court Name: Supreme Court of Virginia
Date Published: Oct 8, 1976
Citation: 1976 Va. LEXIS 287
Docket Number: Record No. 760057
Court Abbreviation: Va.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.