Darrisaw v Strong Mem. Hosp.Darrisaw v Strong Mem. Hosp.
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Hite & Beaumont, P.C., Albany (John H. Beaumont of counsel), for appellant.
Osborn, Reed & Burke, LLP, Rochester (Christian C. Casini of counsel), for respondents.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs. We conclude defendants demonstrated their entitlement to summary judgment on the negligence cause of
Additionally, we agree with the Appellate Division majority that plaintiff‘s negligent supervision claim is not before the court because neither the cause of action nor its underlying facts were raised in the complaint.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.