midpage

Darrisaw v Strong Mem. Hosp.Darrisaw v Strong Mem. Hosp.

New York Court of Appeals
Jan 11, 2011
61 SSM 56
Versions:16 NY3d 729
2011 NY Slip Op 00087

Darrisaw v Strong Mem. Hosp., 74 AD3d 1769, affirmed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Hite & Beaumont, P.C., Albany (John H. Beaumont of counsel), for appellant.

Osborn, Reed & Burke, LLP, Rochester (Christian C. Casini of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs. We conclude defendants demonstrated their entitlement to summary judgment on the negligence cause of action. In opposition, plaintiff failed to adduce sufficient evidence to raise a triable issue of fact on the allegations that Nurse Baldwin grabbed decedent‘s arm or caused her to fall to the ground.

Additionally, we agree with the Appellate Division majority that plaintiff‘s negligent supervision claim is not before the court because neither the cause of action nor its underlying facts were raised in the complaint.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Darrisaw v Strong Mem. Hosp.
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 11, 2011
Citations: 16 NY3d 729; 2011 NY Slip Op 00087; 61 SSM 56
Docket Number: 61 SSM 56
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In