History
  • No items yet
midpage
Darlington v. Mager
256 U.S. 682
SCOTUS
1921
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Affirmed with costs, upon authority of the Act of February 24, 1919, c. 18, § 213a, 40 Stat., 1057,; 1065; Act of September 8, 1916, c. 463, § 2 (a), 39 Stat. 756, 757; Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. v. Smietanka, 255 U. S. 509; Eldorado Coal & Mining Co. v. Mager, 255 U. S. 522; Goodrich v. Edwards, 255 U. S. 527; and Walsh v. Brewster 255 U. S. 536. Mr. Herbert Pope, with whom Mr. RusnC. Butler, Mr. James J. For stall and Mr. E. B. Prettyman were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. The Solicitor General for defendant in error.

Case Details

Case Name: Darlington v. Mager
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Apr 18, 1921
Citation: 256 U.S. 682
Docket Number: No. 716
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.