History
  • No items yet
midpage
Darius Riddle v. WF Ambers Arlington
02-23-00476-CV
Tex. App.
May 23, 2024
Check Treatment

DARIUS RIDDLE, Appellant V. WF AMBERS ARLINGTON, Appellee

No. 02-23-00476-CV

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

May 23, 2024

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023-007517-1

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant‘s brief was due on April 8, 2024. On April 25, 2024, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant‘s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief‘s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: May 23, 2024

Case Details

Case Name: Darius Riddle v. WF Ambers Arlington
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: May 23, 2024
Citation: 02-23-00476-CV
Docket Number: 02-23-00476-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In