History
  • No items yet
midpage
Daniel v. Wilson
626 So. 2d 1277
Ala.
1993
Check Treatment

Velson Fox Daniel appeals from the final settlement of the estate of his brother, Elo Daniel, in Pickens County, Alabama. The judgment of the trial court is due to be affirmed on the authority of Rule 28, A.R.App.P.; Eady v. Stewart Dredging Construction Co., 463 So.2d 156 (Ala. 1985); Lambert v. PinckardAgency, Inc., 516 So.2d 697 (Ala.Civ.App. 1987); and Cumminsv. Slayton, 545 So.2d 783 (Ala.Civ.App. 1989). "While we attempt to avoid dismissing appeals or affirming judgments on what may be seen as technicalities, we are sometimes unable to address the merits of an appellant's claim when the appellant fails to articulate that claim and presents no authorities in support of that claim." Stover v. Alabama Farm Bureau Ins. Co.,467 So.2d 251, 253 (Ala. 1985).

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX and HOUSTON, JJ., concur.

KENNEDY, J., concurs in the result.

Case Details

Case Name: Daniel v. Wilson
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jul 23, 1993
Citation: 626 So. 2d 1277
Docket Number: 1920705
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.