History
  • No items yet
midpage
Daniel v. Chastaine
48 Ga. App. 799
Ga. Ct. App.
1934
Check Treatment
Sutton, J.

This ease was carried to the Supreme Court by direct bill of exceptions; and that-,court, not having jurisdiction of the same, transferred the matter to this court for disposition. Daniel v. Chastaine, 177 Ga. 730. A judgment of the superior court of Richmond county dismissing a motion of the defendant in garnishment to have the garnishment bond strengthened, .on the ground that that court did not have jurisdiction of the matter, is not a final judgment from which a writ of error lies direct to this court. Civil Code (1910), § 6138; Ross v. Mercer, 115 Ga. 353 (41 S. E. 594) ; Mathews v. Rountree, 123 Ga. 327 (51 S. E. 423). Direction is given that the official copy of the bill of exceptions of file in the clerk’s office of the court below operate as exceptions pendente lite in the cause.

Writ of error dismissed, with direction.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Daniel v. Chastaine
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 16, 1934
Citation: 48 Ga. App. 799
Docket Number: 23672
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.