History
  • No items yet
midpage
Daniel v. Charping
151 Ga. 34
Ga.
1921
Check Treatment
George, J.

1. A deed absolute in form may be shown to have been made to secure a debt, where the maker remains in possession of the land. Civil Code, § 3258; Bashinski v. Swint, 133 Ga. 38 (65 S. E. 152); Mercer v. Morgan, 136 Ga. 632 (71 S. E. 1075); Renitz v Williamson, 149 Ga. 241 (99 S. E. 869).

2. Accordingly, the court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition, and in admitting in evidence upon the trial of the case parol testimony tending to sustain the allegations of the petition, it appearing that the plaintiff in the equitable suit remained in the possession of the land.

3. That the court in his charge to the jury intimated an opinion upon an uncontested and undisputed fact in the case is not cause for a new trial.

4. The evidence authorized the verdiet.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Z. B. Rogers, for plaintiff in error. Gh'ogan & Payne, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Daniel v. Charping
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jan 14, 1921
Citation: 151 Ga. 34
Docket Number: No. 1916
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.