History
  • No items yet
midpage
Danek v. Hommer
15 N.J. 573
| N.J. | 1954
|
Check Treatment
15 N.J. 573 (1954)
105 A.2d 677

JOHN DANEK, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JULIUS J. HOMMER AND KATHERYN HOMMER, PARTNERS TRADING AS HOMMER TOOL MFG. CO., DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued June 7, 1954.
Decided June 14, 1954.

Mr. Robert Shaw argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Shaw, Hughes & Pindar, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph Weintraub argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. McGlynn, Weintraub & Stein, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Francis in the court below.

HEHER, J., concurring in result.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Danek v. Hommer
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 14, 1954
Citation: 15 N.J. 573
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.