History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dalmazzo v. Drysdale
21 P. 553
Cal.
1889
Check Treatment
BEATTY, C. J.

This case was submitted without oral argument on briefs to be filed, the appellants to file the first brief. The time allowed appellants to file their brief has elapsed, no brief has been filed by appellants, no extension of time has been asked, and respondent moves for affirmance of the judgment and order appealed from. Where appellant fails to point out any error in the judgment or order appealed from, the court will not look into the record for the purpose of discovering error. Judgment and order affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.

Case Details

Case Name: Dalmazzo v. Drysdale
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1889
Citation: 21 P. 553
Docket Number: No. 12,956
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.