Dallio v. FischerDallio v. Fischer
We confirm. To the extent that petitioner challenges the evidentiary basis of the determination, we conclude that the misbehavior report and the hearing testimony of its author provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Sanders v Goord, 47 AD3d 987, 988 [2008]). We reject petitioner‘s contention that he was denied the right to call certain witnesses at the hearing as the witnesses requested had no first-hand knowledge of the incident (see Matter of Washington v Napoli, 61 AD3d 1243, 1243 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 704 [2009]). Finally, petitioner‘s contention that the misbehavior report was written in retaliation for a grievance he had filed presented a credibility determination for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Johnson v Goord, 46 AD3d 1038, 1038-1039 [2007]).
Peters, J.P., Lahtinen, Kane, Kavanagh and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.