History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dalas v. Gere
267 A.D. 765
N.Y. App. Div.
1943
Check Treatment

Order granting plaintiff’s motion to open his default in appearing in opposition to a motion to dismiss the action for lack of prosecution, et cetera, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to renew the motion within ten days after the entry of the order hereon, if he be so advised. There was no showing that the neglect to bring the action to trial was not unreasonable, within the meaning of rule 156 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Hence the motion should not have been granted. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Dalas v. Gere
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 6, 1943
Citation: 267 A.D. 765
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.