Case Information
*1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION WASEEM DAKER,
Petitioner, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:17-cv-23 v.
WARDEN MARTY ALLEN,
Respondent.
ORDER
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Reports and Recommendations; (docs. 10, 15), to which Petitioner Waseem Daker ("Daker") filed Partial Objections, (doc. 36).1 Daker's Objections reiterate the arguments already presented and which the Magistrate Judge correctly rejected. Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES Daker's Objections and ADOPTS the Reports and Recommendations as the opinion of the Court.
1 Daker also filed a third Motion for Extension of Time to File| Objections. (Doc. 34.) However, the Court explicitly and extensively warned Daker that he would hot be granted any further extensions. (Doc. 32, pp. 1, 3-4.) Daker claims he just received wrist surgery—it is unclear on which hand—and cannot "do any typing/extensive writing for several weeks." (Doc. 34, p. 1.) However, Petitioner was still able to submit two Motions for Extension, his Partial Objections, and a Motion for Access to Case Authorities. (Docs. 34-37.) Daker also argues that he cannot submit complete Objections because he does not have copies of his prior filings. (Doc. 36, pp. 1-2.) However, as theMagistrate Judge explained at length, while Daker has no right to free copies, he may purchase copies of any filings in the case with the Court. (Doc. 22, 32.) Accordingly, the Court DENIES Dakeij's Motion for Extension ofTime to File Objections, (doc. 34), and his Partial Objections are deemed the only Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Reports and Recommendations.
The Court DISMISSES the forty-seven (47) claims enumerated within the June 2, 2017, Report and Recommendation, and DISMISSES AS MQOT Daker's Emergency Motions, (docs. 4-7).
SO ORDERED, this //eta day of September, 2017.
J. RANDMJJALL, CHIEF JUDGE UNITEDSTATES DISTRICT COURT .SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA