History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dailey v. Gidinsky
293 N.Y. 889
NY
1944
Check Treatment

The final judgment should be modified by striking therefrom the direction for payment to the plaintiff receiver of sums to be fixed by the court in which the receivership is pending. Whether such payment shall be made to the plaintiff receiver must be determined by the court which appointed him. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 804-a, 1547.) In all other respects, the judgments should be affirmed, with costs.

The judgments should be modified in accordance with this opinion and as so modified affirmed, with costs.

LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly. *Page 891

Case Details

Case Name: Dailey v. Gidinsky
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 30, 1944
Citation: 293 N.Y. 889
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.