History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dail v. . Taylor
156 N.C. 588
N.C.
1911
Check Treatment

There was verdict for the plaintiff. Judgment thereon, and defendant excepted and appealed. The principles applicable to this case were fully considered and stated on a former appeal, as reported in 151 N.C. 284. There is no substantial difference in the facts as they now appear, except that the testimony tending to show negligence on the part of the defendant has been greatly strengthened. The Court has carefully examined the record, and is of opinion that the cause has been tried in accordance with the former decision referred to, and that no reversible error appears. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

No error.

Case Details

Case Name: Dail v. . Taylor
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Sep 27, 1911
Citation: 156 N.C. 588
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.