History
  • No items yet
midpage
Daeche v. Bollschweiler
241 U.S. 641
SCOTUS
1916
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Fay v. Crozer, 217 U. S. 455; Hannis Distilling Co. v. Baltimore, 216 U. S. 285, 288; Hendricks v. United States, 223 U. S. 178, 184; (2) Benson v. Henkel, 198 U. S. 1, 10-11; Pierce v. Creecy, 210 U. S. 387, 401-402; (3) Glasgow v. Moyer, 225 U. S. 420; Johnson v. Hoy, 227 U. S. 245; Henry v. Henkel, 235 U. S. 219.

Case Details

Case Name: Daeche v. Bollschweiler
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Feb 21, 1916
Citation: 241 U.S. 641
Docket Number: No. 794
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.