History
  • No items yet
midpage
D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Gray
32 Minn. 53
Minn.
1884
Check Treatment
By the Court. 1

Where, in a bill of costs offered for adjustment, are items for witnesses who, for any cause, were not sworn, if the items are objected to, an affidavit showing the attendance and travel of the witnesses, and stating that they were “necessary and material,” is not sufficient. There must be an affidavit stating facts which show the necessity of having them in attendance, which affidavit the party may furnish when the items are objected to.

Judgment affirmed.

Dickinson, J., because of illness, took no part in this decision.

Case Details

Case Name: D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Gray
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Apr 21, 1884
Citation: 32 Minn. 53
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.