midpage

D'Atri v. VignalatsD'Atri v. Vignalats

Nevada Supreme Court
Dec 30, 1976
No. 8938
Reporters:
,

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Although appellants contend the district ‍​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‍court erred in granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment, they ‍​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‍have faded to demonstrate error, as contemplated by our rules, through ‍​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‍briefs citing pertinent portions of the record and relevant authority. ‍​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‍Accordingly, we will not consider their contentions. Holland Livestock v. ‍​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‍B & C Enterprises, 92 Nev. 473, 553 P.2d 950 (1976).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: D'Atri v. Vignalats
Court Name: Nevada Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 30, 1976
Citations: 557 P.2d 272; 92 Nev. 748; No. 8938
Docket Number: No. 8938
Court Abbreviation: Nev.
Log In