History
  • No items yet
midpage
Czesznek v. Ruffy Corp.
259 A.D. 302
N.Y. App. Div.
1940
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. (Rohrbacher v. Gillig, 203 N. Y. 413; Hudson v. Church of Holy Trinity, 250 id. 513.) The instructions by the defendant’s superintendent to the plaintiff on the day preceding the accident to place the mash in the boiler room of the cellar did not constitute an assurance to the plaintiff that he might proceed there safely in complete darkness and without guidance.

*303The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Judgment unanimously reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Czesznek v. Ruffy Corp.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 19, 1940
Citation: 259 A.D. 302
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.