70 Iowa 49 | Iowa | 1886
I. The commissioner appointed by tbe court ínade a survey, and took the testimony of witnesses, in order
Certain witnesses testified to the place of a corner which seems to have controlled in establishing the line by a prior survey. This corner is claimed to be correct by defendants. We think the survey made by the commissioner overcomes théir testimony. We are of the opinion that this corner was mistakenly recognized by the surveyor making the prior survey.
We reach the conclusion that the court below. rightly approved and confirmed the commissioner’s report, and established the corners and boundaries as located by him.
II. Defendants insist that they, or some of them, have been in actual adverse possession of the land for more than
Davis v. Curtis, 68 Iowa, 66, is not in conflict with our conclusions in this case. ,x
The judgment of the district court is
Aebtrmed.