History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cutchin v. Wilkinson
1 Call 3
Va. Ct. App.
1797
Check Treatment
PER C UR.

The precedents cited and the arguments urged by the appellant’s counsel are decisive. They prove, that the person entitled to the estate is entitled to the administration also ; and consequently that the appellee has no title. The only question which could have arisen, would have been between Cutehin and the executors of the widow; but as the executors do not appear to have, made any opposition, and as the appellee had no right, the District Court certainly erred in reversing the judgment of the County Court. Therefore, the judgment of the District Court must be reversed, and that of 'the County Court affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Cutchin v. Wilkinson
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Virginia
Date Published: Apr 22, 1797
Citation: 1 Call 3
Court Abbreviation: Va. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.