History
  • No items yet
midpage
Custer v. Tompkins County Bank
9 Pa. 27
Pa.
1848
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This cause is ruled by The Bank of Pittsburgh v. Whitehead. The rule laid down there, is, that notice to a corporator is not notice to the corporation, unless he were constituted an organ of communication between it and those who deal with it. The corporator, in this case, was not such an organ, and the evidence was properly rejected.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Custer v. Tompkins County Bank
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jul 12, 1848
Citation: 9 Pa. 27
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.