History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cusick v. Beyers
5 Wash. 98
Wash.
1892
Check Treatment

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

Respondent moves to dismiss this appeal because no notice thereof was given. Several days after *99the rendition of judgment it appears by a journal entry that appellant attempted to give notice of appeal orally in open court. The statute makes no provision for such a notice. A notice given in open court must be given at the time judgment is rendered, and it not appearing that the respondent was even present at the time, or that he had any notice of the appeal in fact, the motion to dismiss must be granted.

Anders, C. J., and Stiles, Dunbar and Hoyt, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Cusick v. Beyers
Court Name: Washington Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 20, 1892
Citation: 5 Wash. 98
Docket Number: No. 644
Court Abbreviation: Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.