midpage

Curvin J. Trone, Jr., Trustee for Westgate California Corporation, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. C. Arnholt Smith, Defendants-PetitionersCurvin J. Trone, Jr., Trustee for Westgate California Corporation, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. C. Arnholt Smith, Defendants-Petitioners

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
May 10, 1977
77-8116
Versions:553 F.2d 1207
1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13467

Despite the implications in Cord v. Smith, 338 F.2d 516 (9th Cir. 1964), we conclude that 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) is not the proper avenue by which to obtain review of the district court’s denial of a motion to disqualify an attorney for conflict of interest. See Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 496 F.2d 800 (2d Cir. 1974) (in banc). See also Melamed v. ITT Continental Baking Co., 534 F.2d 82 (6th Cir. 1976); Draganescu v. First National Bank of Hollywood, 502 F.2d 550 (5th Cir. 1974). We therefore deny permission to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). The accompanying motion for a stay of further proceedings is denied without prejudice.

Case Details

Case Name: Curvin J. Trone, Jr., Trustee for Westgate California Corporation, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. C. Arnholt Smith, Defendants-Petitioners
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: May 10, 1977
Citations: 553 F.2d 1207; 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13467; 77-8116
Docket Number: 77-8116
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
Log In