History
  • No items yet
midpage
Curtiss v. Sprague
49 Cal. 301
| Cal. | 1874
|
Check Treatment
By the Court, Wallace, C. J.:

The counter-claim was barred by the Statute of Limitations, and, under the provisions of the Practice Act, the plaintiff must be considered to have pleaded the statute by way of replication to the counter-claim.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial. Remittitur forthwith.

Neither Mr. Justice Crockett nor Mr. Justice Rhodes expressed an opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Curtiss v. Sprague
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1874
Citation: 49 Cal. 301
Docket Number: No. 3,629
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.