History
  • No items yet
midpage
Curtis v. State
870 So. 2d 186
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2004
|
Check Treatment
870 So. 2d 186 (2004)

Franklin CURTIS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D03-2330.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 27, 2004.
Rehearing Denied March 23, 2004.

DAVIS, Judge.

Franklin Curtis challenges the order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. While habeas corpus is not the proper vehicle to address the claims raised by Curtis, they are cognizable in a motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. It is apparent from the trial court's analysis that it treated Curtis' claims as if they were raised in a postconviction motion. Accordingly, finding no error, we affirm without discussion.

Affirmed.

FULMER and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Curtis v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 27, 2004
Citation: 870 So. 2d 186
Docket Number: 2D03-2330
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.