History
  • No items yet
midpage
Curtis v. Square-D Co.
73 Ohio St. 3d 79
Ohio
1995
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated on the authority of McAuliffe v. W. States Import Co., Inc. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 534, 651 N.E.2d 957.

Moyer, C.J., Wright, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.





Dissenting Opinion

Douglas, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I do so on the basis of Justice Francis E. Sweeney’s well-reasoned dissent in McAuliffe v. W. States Import Co., Inc. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 534, 651 N.E.2d 957. Given the majority opinion in McAuliffe, it should now be understood that all common-law products liability causes of action survive the enactment of R.C. 2307.71 et seq., the Ohio Product Liability Act, unless specifically covered by the Act because the Act, according to the majority in McAuliffe, “ * * * falls short of creating a previously unavailable cause of action * * Id. at 538, 651 N.E.2d at 960. The courts of appeals were right in both this case and McAuliffe.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Curtis v. Square-D Co.
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 16, 1995
Citation: 73 Ohio St. 3d 79
Docket Number: No. 95-185
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.